Message #4048
From: Ed Ussery <metamind@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Physical 2x2x2x2 HOF
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:27:08 -0700
Hello Melinda,
I’ve been loosely following the discussion and developments of the physical 2x2x2x2.I’m interested in acquiring one pre-fabricated. It looks like itwill take too much time for me to build one myself.
What’s the price?
(You’re amazing, by the way!)
Ed
—–Original Message—–
From: "Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com [4D_Cubing]" <4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Jun 21, 2018 4:09 PM
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [MC4D] Physical 2x2x2x2 HOF
Hello Marc,
Good point about rule sets. Solution notes makes sense but I don't<br>
want to tarnish anyone's accomplishment. I decided to be much more<br>
liberal about this than I am for MC4D, especially for past<br>
solutions. In those cases I'm pretty much just deciding whether the<br>
person appears to have demonstrated the ability to solve the puzzle.<br>
I encourage those people to produce a new or updated video using the<br>
canonical set but I don't want to require that.
I really want to add your name to the list too. We're now up to 6,<br>
so if you want to get in the first 10, you should probably get<br>
moving! :-)
Happy puzzling!
-Melinda
On 6/21/2018 10:17 AM, Marc Ringuette<br>
ringuette@solarmirror.com [4D_Cubing] wrote:
<br>
<br>
Hi, Melinda,
Good idea to start the HOF list. It's worth noting that there<br>
are a variety of rule sets, and associated details, being used in<br>
the first four solutions on the list (I'm not familiar with the<br>
5th, Joseph's).
Because our rule sets are still in flux, and because I think they<br>
should STAY in flux for quite a while ... I suggest adding a<br>
"notes" field to the HOF list, to describe what kind of solution<br>
it was.
Here are the notes I'd personally attach to the first four<br>
solutions on the HOF list.
Bob's: strict rules, well described, no video
Zander's: parity violating 4-cycles used, full video
Luna's: strict rules, full video
Chris's: poor scramble, semi-strict rules, 4-cycle shortcuts used<br>
with parity correction, has video
Cheers
Marc
On 6/20/2018 9:12 PM, Melinda Green melinda@superliminal.com<br>
[4D_Cubing] wrote:
Just a quick note to let you know that I’ve created a HOF for the physical 2^4. All
feedback welcome. If any of you besides Zander and Luna have
solved it, I’d love to add you to the list. We’re currently
up to solver #5, so if you want to get yourself into the
first 10, it would be good to do that soon as we’ve already
shipped over 30 puzzles! The Can-Chris-Solve videos resulted
in at least 10 sales, and he plans to launch a final video
on Saturday in which he fixes his pop and properly finishes
his solve.
-Melinda
_