Message #1625

From: schuma <mananself@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Flat Rubik
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:52:29 -0000

Hi Eduard,

I believe the reason why nobody comments on it is because the developer of the website introduced it three months ago

http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/4D_Cubing/message/1378

You can check out the previous discussions.

Nan

— In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Eduard" <baumann@…> wrote:
>
> I wonder that nobody comments FlatRubik.
> There is an interesting relationship between MagicTile and FlatRubik.
> The "Rotate 7x7" in FlatRubik is a "495" (square, 9 colors, length 5)
> compared to the "695" in MagicTile (hexagonal, 9 colors, length 5).
> Of course all MagigTile have order 3 vertices. Rotate 7x7 has order 4 vertices.
>
>
> — In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, "Eduard" <baumann@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Flat Rubik <http://www.puzzlemystery.com/default.aspx>
> >
> > I like this site. I have seen that Andrey Astrelin is also there. On my
> > demand they have kindly installed a script possibility. They do not
> > explicitely ask to return all numbers to home (mode 2) but only render
> > solid color blocks (mode 1). I prefer to play mode 2. "Double shift" has
> > the property that there the invers of the twist is not offered.
> > Interesting. The twist are of order 7. So twist^(7-1) gives the invers.
> >
>