Message #2814
From: andreyastrelin@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: New puzzles
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:02:29 -0800
100 puzzles solved :)
Andrey
—In 4d_cubing@yahoogroups.com, <andreyastrelin@…> wrote:
{10,3} 18C F0.67:0:1 solved. 2680 twists.
It was easy enough (if you know how to handle pieces with wrong orientation).
Andrey
—In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, <ed.baumann@…> wrote:
I’am playing with MT hyp {10,3],18C F0:0:1(not F1:0:0). 300 twists for 4 of the 18 colors so far. I don’t care for the number of twists and use 3 cycles all the way even early in order to not disturb anything. I also complete colors before starting a new one. So this puzzle is not so hard to solve but funny.
I will complete wiki for the 60 new puzzles and effectively aim for the new 50%.
Ed
—– Original Message —–
From: andreyastrelin@… mailto:andreyastrelin@…
To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com mailto:4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [MC4D] New puzzles
May be, but in 120-Cell you have some search tools. In 36-color tiles there is many similar colors that makes difficult searching of the correct tile (even when you make one face white and all others dark). Pieces of F1:0:0 are very thin, most of them are close to boundary, so you don’t even see them all.
Topology of {10,3}, 36C is not very easy (actually, I don’t understand it at all). When I look for the tile, I’m not always sure that my search covers whole fundamental area, so I can go over the same part again and again. And there are problems with finding a way for tiles that doesn’t disturb already solved parts.
Andrey
—In 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com, <melinda@…> wrote:
What about it is difficult? I would guess that more colors makes it more tedious but not harder, similar to 3^4 versus 120-Cell.
-Melinda
On 11/15/2013 1:44 PM, andreyastrelin@… mailto:andreyastrelin@… wrote:
I’ve solved {10,3}, 36C, F:0:0:1. It was difficult - it has too many colors. Total count is 2518 twists.
Andrey